Consequences of genital mutilation (circumcision) corresponds to amputation of limbs


Neurologically speaking, the life-long sexual sensory deprivation which results from circumcision has a profound effect on the neural organization of the brain, similar to that found in any amputee: corresponding neurons associated with states of sexual and emotional ecstasy die, and adjacent neural regions grow chaotically into the dead zone. Furthermore, childhood victims of traumatic abuse tend to have a variety of brain abnormalities, reflecting a generalized rewiring of the brain to adapt to a hostile environment. The psychological impact of such Brain Damage is likely to be Far Reaching.The phenomenon of circumcision serves a practical function of lowering excitability and distractibility quotients-sexual arousal-of pubescent males, i.e. biasing young males toward increased tractability which would enhance group efforts and less toward individual goals of amorous exchanges. Neurological data suggest that early lesions of the Prepuce/foreskin tissues would generate a reorganization/atrophy of the brain circuitry. This re-organization/atrophy, in turn, is suggested to lower sexual excitability. Inferential data support the hypothesis that a practical consequence of circumcision, complementary to any religious-symbolic function, is to make a circumcised male less excitable and distractible, and, hence, more amenable to his group’s authority figures.

Abstract: A Biocultural Analysis of Circumcision. Ronald Immerman, Department of Psychiatry, MetroHealth Medical Centre, Case Western Reserve University, and W.C Mackey. Social Biology 1998, Volume 44, Pages 265-275. [101]

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Consequences of genital mutilation (circumcision) corresponds to amputation of limbs

  1. Hi there very cool web site!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I’ll bookmark your blog and take the feeds also¡KI’m satisfied to find numerous helpful info here in the submit, we’d like develop extra strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  2. We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done a formidable job and our entire community will be grateful to you.

  3. Ovenstående er en HYPOTESE fra 1998 om at omskæring nedsætter seksualdriften.
    Jeg tror ganske enkelt ikke på det.
    Min erfaring med tre omskårne mænd siger, at seksualdriften stiger, men evnen til at opnå fuld tilfredsstillelse falder. Dette stemmer godt overens med, at Abrahams omskæringsdeal med Vorherre gik ud på, at HVIS Abraham omskar først sine efterkommere og dernæst sig selv, SÅ ville Vorherre belønne ham med, at hans stamme skulle mangfoldiggøres på denne jord.

    Victoria troede, at hendes deal med Vorherre var, at hvis hun sørgede for at få Englands sønner omskåret, så ville de holde op med at onanere, fordi det blev for besværligt, og fordi det – i stedet for at være lystbetonet – gjorde ondt 😦

    • Glemte:
      Det er som sagt en hypotese fra 1998, og hvis hypotesen ikke siden er blevet sandsynliggjort gennem undersøgelser og ophøjet til teori, så synes jeg, du skulle slette den fra dette site. Efter min mening er den fuldstændig misvisende.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s